SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS 2021

▼
Sunday, May 16, 2021

In the instance in which the Petition for Quo Warranto is filed by an individual in his own name, he must be able to prove that he is entitled to the controverted public office, position, or franchise; otherwise, the holder of the same has a right to the undisturbed possession thereof. In actions for Quo Warranto to determine title to a public office, the complaint, to be sufficient in form, must show that the plaintiff is entitled to the office. In Garcia v. Perez, this Court ruled that the person instituting Quo Warranto proceedings on his own behalf, under Section 5, Rule 66 of the Rules of Court, must aver and be able to show that he is entitled to the office in dispute. Without such averment or evidence of such right, the action may be dismissed at any stage

›
  EN BANC G.R. No. 179895             December 18, 2008 FERDINAND S. TOPACIO,  petitioner, vs. ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN GREGOR...
Monday, May 10, 2021

EXAMINATION ANSWERS/ JAN CARLO TISO

›
  Jan Carlo A.  Tiso JD-3 Special Civil Actions     I The features of Rule 65 to make it under special  civil actions is that an original ac...

The Writs of Certiorari and Prohibition Are Proper Remedies to Test the Constitutionality of Statutes/MAGALONA V. ERMITA 2011

›
  EN BANC G.R No. 187167               August 16, 2011 PROF. MERLIN M. MAGALLONA, AKBAYAN PARTY-LIST REP. RISA HONTIVEROS, PROF. HARRY C. RO...
›
Home
View web version

Contributors

  • Ana Christel Angeles
  • Charles Gilaga
  • Flores May L. Orosa
  • Geselle Saguin
  • Hannah Grace Refugio
  • Jan Carlo Tiso
  • Krizabel Martinez
  • Linalyn Bation
  • Noriza Jean Daga
  • Suzeyne Garcia
  • kimari018
  • rsb
Powered by Blogger.